CTP与HR-MRI对颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术疗效的评估及应用价值
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.苏州大学附属第二医院 影像科,江苏 苏州 215004;2.江苏省苏州市中西医结合医院 影像科,江苏 苏州 215101

作者简介:

王鑫,苏州大学附属第二医院主管技师,主要从事医学影像技术方面的研究。

基金项目:

2020年度省部共建放射医学与辐射防护国家重点实验室开放基金资助项目(GZK1202009)。


Efficacy evaluation and application value of CTP and HR-MRI for patients with carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Medical Imaging, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215004, China;2.Department of Medical Imaging, Suzhou Integrated Traditional Chinese And Western Medicine Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215101

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 颈动脉狭窄是导致脑卒中尤其是缺血性脑卒中的重要原因,早期发现及有效治疗是减少缺血性脑卒中发生的关键。颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)是治疗颈动脉狭窄的常用方法,但术中和术后可能发生各种并发症,以及发生再次狭窄或闭塞的风险,因此,通过有效的方法对其进行疗效评估具有重要的临床意义。本研究分析CT灌注成像(CTP)与高分辨磁共振成像(HR-MRI)对颈动脉狭窄患者CAS术后疗效的评估效能。方法 收集2017年2月—2020年2月期间44例颈动脉狭窄并接受CAS治疗的患者资料,所有入选患者于手术前、手术后2个月行CTP、HR-MRI以及DSA检查,比较患者手术前后CTP与HR-MRI参数的差异,以DSA检查结果作为金标准,比较两种方法诊断颈动脉残余狭窄的效能。结果 CTP结果显示,与术前比较,患者术后2个月大脑动脉相对脑血流量明显增多,相对通过时间、相对达峰时间明显减少(均P<0.05),相对脑血容量无明显差异(P>0.05);HR-MRI结果显示,与术前比较,患者术后2个月血管面积、管壁面积以及管腔面积无明显差异(均P>0.05),斑块面积、斑块负荷明显减小(均P<0.05)。DSA检查出16支颈动脉存在狭窄,颈动脉狭窄改善率为80.00%,CTP检查出颈动脉存在狭窄12支,颈动脉狭窄改善率为85.00%,HR-MRI检查出颈动脉存在狭窄14支,颈动脉狭窄改善率为82.50%,两种检查方式对颈动脉残余狭窄的诊断效能相当(P>0.05)。结论 CTP、HR-MRI均可用于颈动脉狭窄患者CAS疗效评估,两种方法补充使用,具有一定的临床应用价值。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Carotid stenosis is an important cause of stroke, especially ischemic stroke. Early detection and effective treatment are essential for reducing the occurrence of ischemic stroke. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a common modality for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but various complications may occur during and after this procedure, and there is still the risk of restenosis or occlusion, thus evaluating its efficacy through effective methods is of important clinical significance. This study was conducted to analyzed the assessing abilities of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) in patients with carotid stenosis after CAS.Methods The data of 44 patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CAS treatment between February 2017 and February 2020 were collected. All the included patients underwent CTP, HR-MRI and DSA examinations before and 2 months after CAS. The differences in the parameters of CTP and HR-MRI before and after CAS were compared, and using the results of DSA as a gold standard, the relative efficiency of the two methods in detecting residual carotid artery stenosis was compared.Results The results of CTP showed that the relative cerebral blood flow of cerebral artery was increased and the relative transit time and relative time to peak were decreased significantly (all P<0.05), while no significant difference was noted in the relative cerebral blood volume on 2 months after operation compared with their values before operation (P>0.05). The results of HR-MRI showed that there were no significant differences in the vascular area, tube wall area and lumen area (all P>0.05), and the plaque area and plaque load were significantly reduced on 2 months after operation compared with their values before operation (both P<0.05). DSA detected 16 branches of carotid arteries with stenosis, and the improvement rate of carotid artery stenosis was 80.00%, CTP detected 12 branches of carotid arteries with stenosis, and the improvement rate of carotid artery stenosis was 85.00%, and HR-MRI detected 14 branches of carotid arteries with stenosis, and the improvement rate of carotid artery stenosis was 82.50%. The two methods had a similar ability in detecting the residual carotid artery stenosis (P>0.05).Conclusion Both CTP and HR-MRI can be used to evaluate the efficacy of CAS in patients with carotid stenosis. The complementary use of the two methods has certain clinical application value.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王鑫,常冬梅,赵春阳,沈小红,李志伟,周志敏,张博. CTP与HR-MRI对颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术疗效的评估及应用价值[J].中国普通外科杂志,2021,30(12):1453-1459.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2021.12.009

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-17
  • 最后修改日期:2021-11-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-01-07