长链非编码RNA FGD5-AS1调控miR-142-3p/PDK1信号轴在胃癌中的作用及机制
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院 普通外科,北京 100029

作者简介:

李华志,首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院主治医师,主要从事腹腔镜胃肠手术、肝脏手术相关方面的研究。

基金项目:


The function and mechanism of long non-coding RNA FGD5-AS1 in regulating the miR-142-3p/PDK1 signaling axis in gastric cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 研究显示,长链非编码RNA(lncRNA)FGD5-AS1在胃癌(GC)中发挥致癌基因的作用。笔者前期通过生物信息学分析发现,FGD5-AS1与微小RNA-142-3p(miR-142-3p)、miR-142-3p与丙酮酸脱氢酶激酶1(PDK1)之间存在结合位点。因此,本研究探讨FGD5-AS1靶向miR-142-3p/PDK1对GC细胞中的表达及作用。方法 利用双荧光素酶报告基因实验验证FGD5-AS1与miR-142-3p、miR-142-3p与PDK1之间的靶向关系。采用qRT-PCR检测GC组织中FGD5-AS1、miR-142-3p和PDK1的表达水平。构建sh-FGD5-AS1干扰体系及miR-142-3p抑制模型,分别或联合转染GC细胞系BGC823,观察细胞增殖(CCK8、EdU)、凋亡(流式细胞术)、迁移与侵袭(Transwell)等生物学行为及相关蛋白表达(Western blot)。通过裸鼠皮下成瘤实验检测FGD5-AS1对GC移植瘤生长的影响。结果 双荧光素酶报告基因实验显示,miR-142-3p mimic可明显降低FGD5-AS1和PDK1野生型(WT)报告基因的荧光活性(均P<0.05),而对突变型(MUT)无影响,证实FGD5-AS1与miR-142-3p、miR-142-3p与PDK1之间存在直接结合关系。敲除FGD5-AS1后,GC细胞中miR-142-3p表达上调,PDK1表达下调,细胞增殖、迁移、侵袭能力减弱,凋亡增强,上述变化可被miR-142-3p抑制剂逆转(均P<0.05)。动物实验显示敲除FGD5-AS1可明显抑制裸鼠移植瘤的生长及移植瘤组织中Ki-67、PDK1表达(均P<0.05)。结论 FGD5-AS1可能通过ceRNA机制靶向吸附miR-142-3p,从而解除对PDK1的抑制,促进GC细胞的增殖与侵袭,并加速肿瘤生长。FGD5-AS1/miR-142-3p/PDK1轴在GC发生发展中发挥关键作用,或可作为潜在的诊疗靶点。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Studies have shown that the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) FGD5-AS1 functions as an oncogene in gastric cancer (GC). Our previous bioinformatics analysis revealed potential binding sites between FGD5-AS1 and microRNA-142-3p (miR-142-3p), as well as between miR-142-3p and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the expression and functional role of the FGD5-AS1/miR-142-3p/PDK1 axis in GC cells.Methods Dual-luciferase reporter assays were used to verify the targeting relationships between FGD5-AS1 and miR-142-3p, and between miR-142-3p and PDK1. qRT-PCR was conducted to measure the expression levels of FGD5-AS1, miR-142-3p, and PDK1 in GC tissues. A knockdown model of FGD5-AS1 (sh-FGD5-AS1) and an miR-142-3p inhibitor were constructed and transfected, alone or in combination, into BGC823 GC cells. Cellular behaviors, including proliferation (CCK8, EdU), apoptosis (flow cytometry), migration, and invasion (Transwell assays), were assessed, along with related protein expression (Western blot). A subcutaneous xenograft model in nude mice was used to evaluate the effect of FGD5-AS1 on tumor growth in vivo.Results The dual-luciferase assays demonstrated that miR-142-3p mimics significantly reduced the luciferase activity of wild-type (WT) FGD5-AS1 and PDK1 reporters (both P<0.05), but had no effect on mutant (MUT) reporters, confirming a direct binding relationship. Knockdown of FGD5-AS1 led to upregulation of miR-142-3p and downregulation of PDK1 in GC cells, with reduced proliferation, migration, and invasion, and enhanced apoptosis (all P<0.05); these effects were reversed by the miR-142-3p inhibitor. In vivo, FGD5-AS1 knockdown significantly inhibited tumor growth in nude mice and decreased Ki-67 and PDK1 expression in tumor tissues (all P<0.05).Conclusion FGD5-AS1 may act as a ceRNA that sponges miR-142-3p, thereby relieving its suppression on PDK1, and promoting GC cell proliferation and invasion as well as tumor progression. The FGD5-AS1/miR-142-3p/PDK1 axis plays a critical role in the development of GC and may serve as a potential therapeutic target.

    图1 Starbase网站分析结果 A:FGD5-AS1与miR-142-3p的结合位点;B:miR-142-3p与PDK1的结合位点Fig.1 StarBase website analysis results A: Binding sites between FGD5-AS1 and miR-142-3p; B: Binding sites between miR-142-3p and PDK1
    图2 qRT-PCR检测临床标本中FGD5-AS1、miR-142-3p、PDK1的表达 注:1)与癌旁组织比较,P<0.05Fig.2 qRT-PCR analysis of FGD5-AS1, miR-142-3p, and PDK1 expression in clinical specimens Note: 1) P<0.05 vs. the adjacent tissue
    图3 各组BGC823细胞中FGD5-AS1、miR-142-3p、PDK1的mRNA表达比较 注:1)与空白对照组比较,P<0.05;2)与sh-NC组比较,P<0.05;3)与sh-FGD5-AS1组比较,P<0.05;4)与sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC组比较,P<0.05Fig.3 Comparison of FGD5-AS1, miR-142-3p, and PDK1 mRNA expression in BGC823 cells across groups Note: 1) P<0.05 vs. the blank control group; 2) P<0.05 vs. the sh-NC group; 3) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1 group; 4) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC group
    图4 细胞增殖检测 A:CCK8法;B:EdU染色法(×400) 注:1)与空白对照组比较,P<0.05;2)与sh-NC组比较,P<0.05;3)与sh-FGD5-AS1组比较,P<0.05;4)与sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC组比较,P<0.05Fig.4 Cell proliferation assays A: CCK-8 assay; B: EdU staining (×400) Note: 1) P<0.05 vs. the blank control group; 2) P<0.05 vs. the sh-NC group; 3) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1 group; 4) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC group
    图5 流式细胞术检测各组BGC823细胞凋亡 注:1)与空白对照组比较,P<0.05;2)与sh-NC组比较,P<0.05;3)与sh-FGD5-AS1组比较,P<0.05;4)与sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC组比较,P<0.05Fig.5 Flow cytometry analysis of apoptosis in BGC823 cells from each group Note: 1) P<0.05 vs. the blank control group; 2) P<0.05 vs. the sh-NC group; 3) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1 group; 4) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC group
    图6 Transwell实验(结晶紫染色,×400) A:细胞迁移检测;B:细胞侵袭检测 注:1)与空白对照组比较,P<0.05;2)与sh-NC组比较,P<0.05;3)与sh-FGD5-AS1组比较,P<0.05;4)与sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC组比较,P<0.05Fig.6 Transwell assay (crystal violet staining, ×400) A: Cell migration assay; B: Cell invasion assay Note: 1) P<0.05 vs. the blank control group; 2) P<0.05 vs. the sh-NC group; 3) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1 group; 4) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC group
    图7 Western blot检测各组BGC823细胞中相关蛋白表达 注:1)与空白对照组比较,P<0.05;2)与sh-NC组比较,P<0.05;3)与sh-FGD5-AS1组比较,P<0.05;4)与sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC组比较,P<0.05Fig.7 Western blot analysis of relevant protein expression in BGC823 cells from each group Note: 1) P<0.05 vs. the blank control group; 2) P<0.05 vs. the sh-NC group; 3) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1 group; 4) P<0.05 vs. the sh-FGD5-AS1+inhibitor-NC group
    图8 两组小鼠移植瘤情况比较 A:移植瘤大体标本;B:移植瘤体积与质量比较 注:1)与sh-NC组比较,P<0.05Fig.8 Comparison of xenograft tumors between the two groups A: Gross specimens of xenograft tumors; B: Comparison of tumor volume and weight Note: 1) P<0.05 vs. the sh-NC group
    图9 免疫组化检测移植瘤组织中Ki-67、PDK1蛋白表达(DAB染色,×200) 注:1)与sh-NC组比较,P<0.05Fig.9 Immunohistochemical detection of Ki-67 and PDK1 protein expression in xenograft tumor tissues (DAB staining, ×200) Note:1) P<0.05 vs. the sh-NC group
    表 1 qRT-PCR引物序列Table 1 qRT-PCR primer sequences
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李华志,孙海涛,曹广,张雅静.长链非编码RNA FGD5-AS1调控miR-142-3p/PDK1信号轴在胃癌中的作用及机制[J].中国普通外科杂志,2025,34(6):1209-1218.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.240537

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-16
  • 最后修改日期:2025-06-17
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-08-01