急性下腔静脉血栓机械清除与导管溶栓治疗的前瞻性随机对照研究
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 血管外科,北京100035;2.首都医科大学,北京 100069

作者简介:

马琳,首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院主管护师,主要从事血管外科动静脉疾病方面的研究。

基金项目:

北京市属医院科研培育计划基金资助项目(PX2022015);北京积水潭医院“学科骨干”计划专项基金资助项目(XKGG202213);首都卫生发展科研专项计划基金资助项目(首发2022-2-2074);北京市自然科学基金资助(7252063)。


Mechanical thrombectomy vs. catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute inferior vena cava thrombosis: a prospective randomized trial
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China;2.Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 急性下腔静脉血栓形成(IVCT)常继发于腔静脉滤器(VCF)植入术后,若未及时处理,不仅可能导致双下肢肿胀、肺栓塞等严重并发症的发生,还会影响滤器的回收率。机械性血栓清除术(PMT)和导管溶栓术(CDT)是目前常用的两种血栓治疗方式,但关于其疗效及安全性的对比研究仍较少。本研究通过前瞻性随机对照试验,比较AngioJet PMT与传统CDT治疗急性IVCT的疗效与安全性,探讨影响滤器回收率的因素,为临床治疗提供循证依据。方法 选取2022年1月—2024年12月于首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院接受治疗的VCF植入后急性IVCT患者,按术式不同随机分为CDT组(46例)和PMT组(48例)。比较两组在滤器回收率、血栓清除效果、手术时间、溶栓药物用量、并发症发生率等方面的差异,并采用Logistic回归分析探讨影响一期滤器回收率的相关因素。结果 共入组94例患者,其中CDT组46例,PMT组48例。PMT组在一期滤器回收率(77.1% vs. 43.5%)、Ⅲ级血栓清除率(70.8% vs. 37.0%)、术后血栓评分及尿激酶使用量、溶栓时间等方面均优于CDT组(均P<0.05)。两组总体滤器回收率及3个月下腔静脉通畅率相近,均超过93%。安全性方面,CDT组导管相关性感染及医用粘胶剂相关皮肤损伤发生率较高,而PMT组更易诱发迷走神经反射症状。Logistic回归分析显示,血栓清除率是影响PMT组一期滤器回收率的独立相关因素(OR=190.773,P<0.05)。结论 与CDT相比,AngioJet PMT联合手动抽吸术在治疗急性IVCT中具有更高的血栓清除率和一期滤器回收率,且可显著缩短溶栓时间、减少药物使用量,但需警惕迷走神经反射的不良反应。两种术式在二期滤器回收率及远期通畅性方面无显著差异。术式选择应结合患者病情、滤器回收时机及个体化需求综合评估。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Acute inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT) commonly occurs secondary to inferior vena cava filter (VCF) implantation. If not promptly treated, it may lead to serious complications such as bilateral lower limb swelling and pulmonary embolism and can also reduce the likelihood of successful filter retrieval. Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are currently the main interventional treatments for IVCT, but comparative studies evaluating their efficacy and safety remain limited. This study was to conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy versus conventional CDT in the treatment of acute IVCT and to explore factors influencing filter retrieval rates, thereby providing evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making.Methods From January 2022 to December 2024, patients diagnosed with acute IVCT following VCF implantation were prospectively enrolled at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Patients were randomly assigned to either the CDT group (n=46) or the PMT group (n=48) according to the interventional procedure used. The two groups were compared in terms of filter retrieval rates, thrombus clearance outcomes, operative time, thrombolytic drug dosage, and incidence of complications. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with primary filter retrieval.Results A total of 94 patients were enrolled, with 46 in the CDT group and 48 in the PMT group. Compared to the CDT group, the PMT group demonstrated a significantly higher primary filter retrieval rate (77.1% vs. 43.5%), grade Ⅲ thrombus clearance rate (70.8% vs. 37.0%), and better postoperative thrombus scores. Additionally, the PMT group required lower urokinase doses and shorter thrombolysis duration (all P<0.05). The overall filter retrieval rate and 3-month IVC patency were similar between groups, both exceeding 93%. Regarding safety, the CDT group had a higher incidence of catheter-related infections and medical adhesive-related skin injury, while vagal reflex symptoms were more frequent in the PMT group. Logistic regression analysis identified thrombus clearance rate as an independent factor significantly associated with primary filter retrieval in the PMT group (OR=190.773, P<0.05).Conclusion Compared to CDT, AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy combined with manual aspiration achieves higher thrombus clearance and primary filter retrieval rates in the treatment of acute IVCT while also reducing thrombolysis duration and drug dosage. However, attention should be paid to the increased risk of vagal reflex symptoms. There was no significant difference between the two groups in secondary filter retrieval rates or long-term IVC patency. The choice of intervention should be based on the patient's condition, timing of filter retrieval, and individualized clinical considerations.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马琳,田轩,郑涵,刘建龙,尹月嫡,王凌燕,李金勇,刘笑,周密,华润.急性下腔静脉血栓机械清除与导管溶栓治疗的前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2025,34(6):1178-1187.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.250290

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-16
  • 最后修改日期:2025-06-19
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-08-01